Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;cpm9ball, post: 1595789, member: 24633&quot;]What Matt has said is more plausible if you think about it.</p><p><br /></p><p>The letters that are impressed into the edge are tapered from the top to the base. Therefore, if this was &quot;double-struck&quot; the letter would appear much thinner from a weak strike or, in the case of a full strike, it would be about the width of the &quot;phantom&quot; letter in question. Since it isn&#039;t that deep, you can rule out this theory.</p><p><br /></p><p>About the only way you could have one show the width that this does is if the edge of another coin hit it. I might add, that if this is actually the case, it appears that the &quot;phantom&quot; letter hit it upside-down. The inside diameter of the upper loop doesn&#039;t appear to be large enough.</p><p><br /></p><p>Chris[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in