Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;non_cents, post: 1798601, member: 30970&quot;]Can you prove that the &quot;cutmark errors&quot; as listed on error-ref.com resemble the coin in the original post?</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Feeder finger errors have to do with marks left on the die, and they are raised anomalies whereas the ones pictured are incuse.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>And where, may I ask, have you heard that? And you do realize that a mint employee purposely damaging a planchet and striking it is still damage and not an error, right?</p><p><br /></p><p>Either way, you see, to be forgetting the big thing here...if this was indeed an error that happened pre-strike (because there would be no possibility of it occurring during strike), the design would be struck OVER it...once again, that is not an opinion, it is a fact.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in