Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;non_cents, post: 1798586, member: 30970&quot;]Have YOU ever heard of a cutmark error, and if so can you provide an article or a single piece of evidence that such an error exists?</p><p>See how the cuts obliterate part of the design? If this was actually an error, the letters would be struck OVER the anomaly. That is not an opinion...that is not a guess...that is a FACT. I should really end it there, as that is all the evidence one needs, but I&#039;ll humor you. In addition, the anomaly continues to the rim and displaces metal along the way. Now, if you actually knew anything about the minting process, you would know that the proto-rims occur when the planchets are run through the upset mill, and become fully formed when the coin expands into the collar die...meaning that damage to the rims would have had to be done AFTER it was struck, and thus cannot be attributed to an error in the minting process. Seriously...please do some research on your part regarding the minting process. Even with the quality of the photos, it is so obviously PMD that I honestly don&#039;t know if you are being serious in your replies. Either way, please stop spreading misinformation, as beginners may be reading these threads and will all of a sudden think that they have a super rare error when in actuality it is just a damaged coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>What, may I ask, is your &quot;proof&quot; for this to be a plausible error?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in