Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;walterallen, post: 159533, member: 4068&quot;]I know the proofs all have mint marks and I&#039;m sure what coinfacts is saying is that eventhough there are no mint marks on the uncirculated coins they know they were minted at West Point begining in 2000. </p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;m really interested in what the Mint is pulling here. Are we to believe that a &quot;mint mark&quot; makes the coin worth double the bullion price?</p><p><br /></p><p>What do CT members think about that. Specially the ASE collectors. What are your views?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in