Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
2005 Buffalo Nickel Question(s)
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Dymaxion22, post: 47564, member: 964"]I don't mean to fuel the debate, but couldn't help thinking as I read all the messages above that there must be some sort of authority about what "uncirculated" means. Then in another thread, I came across GD's post stating "Any time there is a term that you do not understand, try looking here - LINGO". (The link is to the PCGS glossary.)</p><p><br /></p><p>So I went there, and the definition it provides for "uncirculated" is: "Term to indicate a coin or numismatic item that has never been in circulation, a coin without wear."</p><p><br /></p><p>Unfortunately, this definition is ambiguously worded. If you infer an "or" after the comma, then both sides to the debate in this thread are vindicated and the agreement to disagree is well-founded. If you infer an "and" after the comma, however, then having never been in circulation would be a requirement of being uncirculated, in addition to an absence of wear. (If you prefer not to infer any word after the comma, and to take the two phrases as synonymous, then the drafter did a poor job, as the messages in this thread reveal.)</p><p><br /></p><p>Can anyone else point to any more helpful authority?</p><p><br /></p><p>Dymaxion[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Dymaxion22, post: 47564, member: 964"]I don't mean to fuel the debate, but couldn't help thinking as I read all the messages above that there must be some sort of authority about what "uncirculated" means. Then in another thread, I came across GD's post stating "Any time there is a term that you do not understand, try looking here - LINGO". (The link is to the PCGS glossary.) So I went there, and the definition it provides for "uncirculated" is: "Term to indicate a coin or numismatic item that has never been in circulation, a coin without wear." Unfortunately, this definition is ambiguously worded. If you infer an "or" after the comma, then both sides to the debate in this thread are vindicated and the agreement to disagree is well-founded. If you infer an "and" after the comma, however, then having never been in circulation would be a requirement of being uncirculated, in addition to an absence of wear. (If you prefer not to infer any word after the comma, and to take the two phrases as synonymous, then the drafter did a poor job, as the messages in this thread reveal.) Can anyone else point to any more helpful authority? Dymaxion[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
2005 Buffalo Nickel Question(s)
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...