Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Paper Money
>
? 2004 Star Note
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Numbers, post: 1231477, member: 11668"]It comes and goes. Back in the '70s, there was quite the craze for collecting stars by serial groups--if you think modern catalogs have too many detailed numbers, you should see the old O'Donnell one! Then that faded out, and for a number of years most people just collected stars by district. Nowadays a lot of folks collect by runs. What next? Who knows! As with any other area of collecting, the value of a note in the future will be determined (in part) by the preferences of future collectors, which aren't readily predictable.</p><p><br /></p><p>It may be that, twenty years from now, nobody collects stars by run. Or it may be that nobody collects stars any other way. And as your quote points out, even if future collectors *do* care about runs, it may be that the larger runs end up being scarcer, if not as many people save them now. (The BEP printed more 1969C $1's than 1963B $1's, but the latter were hoarded and the former generally were not, so the 1969C is much tougher today.)</p><p><br /></p><p>I'd recommend collecting in a way that interests you, and not worrying too much about the future value of your notes. If you enjoy trying to collect all the runs, then do that. If you'd rather ignore the runs and collect by district, then do that. If you'd rather skip all the modern stuff entirely and collect large-size type, then do that. What you should *not* do, is try to guess what'll be most valuable in the future, and then hoard as many of that thing as you can. There's an excellent chance you'll end up wasting your money, and you probably won't even have much fun in the process.</p><p><br /></p><p>. . .</p><p><br /></p><p>Also, to clarify something mentioned in that quote of yours: Typically, the short star runs are used as replacement sheets, rather than replacement packs. Thus <i>most short-run stars don't exist as full packs</i>, which is part of the reason some collectors enjoy trying to chase them down. These are the runs where it'll never be as simple as "one or two packs [to] satisfy the collector demand for decades". Exceptions exist, where some particular short run *was* turned into replacement packs--and those runs shouldn't, and generally don't, sell for anything like the premiums of the typical short runs.</p><p><br /></p><p>By the way, some of us *are* crazy enough to collect by runs in areas other than modern stars. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie11" alt=":rolleyes:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> For example, I'm working on a run set of non-star 1976 $2's. So far I'm up to 896 out of 899. And no, I don't think anyone's going to pay extra for these notes because of the runs--but that's okay; I didn't pay extra for them either. I'm just a slightly OCD math nerd who appreciates this sort of thing, so it's what I do.... I personally don't understand why some of y'all are into researching the engravers who did the currency designs, but that certainly doesn't mean you *shouldn't* care about them. Different strokes, y'know? <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie6" alt=":cool:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Numbers, post: 1231477, member: 11668"]It comes and goes. Back in the '70s, there was quite the craze for collecting stars by serial groups--if you think modern catalogs have too many detailed numbers, you should see the old O'Donnell one! Then that faded out, and for a number of years most people just collected stars by district. Nowadays a lot of folks collect by runs. What next? Who knows! As with any other area of collecting, the value of a note in the future will be determined (in part) by the preferences of future collectors, which aren't readily predictable. It may be that, twenty years from now, nobody collects stars by run. Or it may be that nobody collects stars any other way. And as your quote points out, even if future collectors *do* care about runs, it may be that the larger runs end up being scarcer, if not as many people save them now. (The BEP printed more 1969C $1's than 1963B $1's, but the latter were hoarded and the former generally were not, so the 1969C is much tougher today.) I'd recommend collecting in a way that interests you, and not worrying too much about the future value of your notes. If you enjoy trying to collect all the runs, then do that. If you'd rather ignore the runs and collect by district, then do that. If you'd rather skip all the modern stuff entirely and collect large-size type, then do that. What you should *not* do, is try to guess what'll be most valuable in the future, and then hoard as many of that thing as you can. There's an excellent chance you'll end up wasting your money, and you probably won't even have much fun in the process. . . . Also, to clarify something mentioned in that quote of yours: Typically, the short star runs are used as replacement sheets, rather than replacement packs. Thus [I]most short-run stars don't exist as full packs[/I], which is part of the reason some collectors enjoy trying to chase them down. These are the runs where it'll never be as simple as "one or two packs [to] satisfy the collector demand for decades". Exceptions exist, where some particular short run *was* turned into replacement packs--and those runs shouldn't, and generally don't, sell for anything like the premiums of the typical short runs. By the way, some of us *are* crazy enough to collect by runs in areas other than modern stars. :rolleyes: For example, I'm working on a run set of non-star 1976 $2's. So far I'm up to 896 out of 899. And no, I don't think anyone's going to pay extra for these notes because of the runs--but that's okay; I didn't pay extra for them either. I'm just a slightly OCD math nerd who appreciates this sort of thing, so it's what I do.... I personally don't understand why some of y'all are into researching the engravers who did the currency designs, but that certainly doesn't mean you *shouldn't* care about them. Different strokes, y'know? :cool:[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Paper Money
>
? 2004 Star Note
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...