2000P Nickel Die Clash

In post #97; "I disagree with you and that's all I have to say"
In post #100 he starts yelling; " ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL SAYS THAT i MAKE A GOOD POINT WELL IF YOU READ THE POST THAT YOU PUT UP mickie KE I SAID THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE SAID IT LOOKS LIKE A FAKE UNTIL YOU STEPPED INTO THE PICTURE"


A regular trouble marker.
And a story teller

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

Jazz
Something you are not looking at and for some reason have blinders on when looking at. The high points of your coin are completely covered by the side of the coin that was layed against it. Where as on the Nickel they are not. The high points are clear. All the lettering from the negative image are behind the main elements, not over the top of them as in your coin. If you were to actually sit down and examine the coin you posted with the one I posted you would see the differences.


Dave

 

My package for PCGS should be arriving no latter then Wednesday (I hope) I can wait until then before submitting it.

Dave

 

Jazz
the cent you put up as evidence shows that the major clash is on the HIGH points which is opposite what the coin in question has. your own photos prove you wrong.

Richard

 

Put this one to bed

Have it graded and then no one can dispute what it is!!!

 

Wow. lots of posts in 3 minutes!

 

Fred Weinberg will authenticate and describe this error accurately. However, your statement that once a coin is slabbed the diagnosis/description cannot be disputed is, well, easily disputed. There are plenty of slabbed coins with inaccurate descriptions/diagnoses. You can even find the occasional slabbed counterfeit.

 

Remember what the monator said ziggy 23456 do not exstend this thread I DISAGREE AND THAT;S IT DAM
jazzcoins joe

 

I believe he was talking to both of us yet you still continue, I was making a point relevent to the topic of discussion, you posted the evicence, not me. and you continue to to call people names.

Richard

 

YOU ARE ANOTHER CULPRIT I WILL CONTIUE TO MAKE MYSELF CLEAR I'M TALKING ABOUT THE PRESSURE MARKS ON THE COIN
JAZZCOINS jOE

 

You have posted 7 times since that comment from the moderator. Do you think he was telling me to shut up and everything was OK for you to continue?

Just curious
Richard

 

I am done with this one! & I am sure Jazz is too

It seem to that there no right answer that you will agree with.

 

You mean the points you were calling hammer marks until I showed how hammer marks couldn't show up on a sandwich coin with clashes on both sides?

 

MY FINALE POST FOR SURE I KEEP TELLING YOU THE PRESSURE MARKS ON THE COIN ; I DISAGREE ,AND SPEDDY ALSO WAS NOT SURE ABOUT THIS COIN GO, AND READ THE POSTS
I'M REALLY DONE THIS TIME

jAZZ

 

The difference is once speedy had it explained to him he saw what was being talked about he didn't coitinue to fight the point after it was proven to be different than what he thought.

 

It is my humble but strong opinion that this happened at the mint.

 

This was said to you and every other member.

As I said above--What I was thinking of was a different type of error. After reading the thread, and looking up details I'm quite sure this is a real error. I don't know of any other way to put it. I was wrong and I will gladly say so.

Now---Like GDJMSP said...lets drop the name calling, and bad mouthing or I will close the thread.

Speedy

Speedy

 

And if Speedy dont get you I WILL :hammer: