Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;micheldura2, post: 701358, member: 18966&quot;]<b>2000d wam</b></p><p><br /></p><p>That is alright Bill,..I kinda thought that is what happened...</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>I was doing some reading on Ken Potters page....and read this...</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://koinpro.tripod.com/Articles/_Ty-2_Reverse_Cent_Varieties.htm" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://koinpro.tripod.com/Articles/_Ty-2_Reverse_Cent_Varieties.htm" rel="nofollow"><b><span style="color: #0000ff">2000 1c Wide AM Type-2 (Proof Style Reverse</span></b></a>)&nbsp; <b><span style="color: #ff0000">From Original Mint State Rolls! </span></b>On the regular business strike variety (Ty-1) the letters AM of AMERICA are close together and almost touching; the designer&#039;s initials, FG, (at the right side of the base of the Memorial Building) are spaced well away from the building. On this business strike with proof style reverse (Ty-2) the letters AM of AMERICA are spaced significantly further apart than on the the Ty-1; the designer&#039;s initials, FG, are close to the base of the Memorial Building.&nbsp; The Ty-2 issue is very scarce on both 1998 and 2000 dated cents</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>So there is a 2000 WAM (Ty-1) where the designer&#039;s initials are far away from the building...so you can&#039;t always totally rely on the FG being close to memorial building for a Wide AM is what I am getting from reading that. And they are almost touching...kinda like my 2000 D...what do you think?<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in