Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
1st 1892/1893 Chicago Half Dollar Proof - Can we see it in Chicago?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="iPen, post: 3989681, member: 69760"]The coin in the #2 envelope is the very first commemorative coin ever struck in US history. It was rejected by mint workers due to a planchet flaw.</p><p><br /></p><p>What's very odd to me are the possible inconsistencies or rather lack of information given. The reporters (who are also the eyewitnesses of the actual striking; see post #2's testimony from one of the multiple reporters there that day) say that one of the mint workers destroyed the coin... yet the coin that Ellsworth refers to is not explicitly described to be damaged/destroyed - is this supposed to be implied?</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1050495[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>So...</p><ul> <li>The coin in the #2 envelope is undamaged by the Mint worker, and thus it is <i>not</i> the first struck coin, or</li> <li>The coin in the #2 envelope is damaged but it wasn't specified in the article, even though the author thought it would be clearly identifiable as coin #2 by its reverse planchet flaw but not the obvious damage for some reason, or</li> <li>The reporters witnessing the destruction of coin #2 were collectively mistaken, or</li> <li>Some other explanation is necessary</li> </ul><p>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="iPen, post: 3989681, member: 69760"]The coin in the #2 envelope is the very first commemorative coin ever struck in US history. It was rejected by mint workers due to a planchet flaw. What's very odd to me are the possible inconsistencies or rather lack of information given. The reporters (who are also the eyewitnesses of the actual striking; see post #2's testimony from one of the multiple reporters there that day) say that one of the mint workers destroyed the coin... yet the coin that Ellsworth refers to is not explicitly described to be damaged/destroyed - is this supposed to be implied? [ATTACH=full]1050495[/ATTACH] So... [LIST] [*]The coin in the #2 envelope is undamaged by the Mint worker, and thus it is [I]not[/I] the first struck coin, or [*]The coin in the #2 envelope is damaged but it wasn't specified in the article, even though the author thought it would be clearly identifiable as coin #2 by its reverse planchet flaw but not the obvious damage for some reason, or [*]The reporters witnessing the destruction of coin #2 were collectively mistaken, or [*]Some other explanation is necessary [/LIST][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
1st 1892/1893 Chicago Half Dollar Proof - Can we see it in Chicago?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...