Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;alurid, post: 3695647, member: 81991&quot;]Interesting indeed. I would not call it a Lamination In the true traditional Numismatic definition of Lamination. A more modern definition needs to be established to describe this type of anomaly.&nbsp; Something that properly describes this new type of error created from a relatively new coin manufacturing process. </p><p>Something like &quot;Electro-Plate Flaking&quot; or &quot;Veneer Flaking&quot;. </p><p>It is a bit disheartening that it resides in an improperly labeled slab.&nbsp; And beyond that I personally would not call this coin a Mint Error due to the fact that cent planchets are outsourced to a private manufacturer and not made at the mint.</p><p>And that is my opinion and others will form there own with or without proper information.</p><p><a href="http://www.error-ref.com/lamination-loss-after-strike/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.error-ref.com/lamination-loss-after-strike/" rel="nofollow">http://www.error-ref.com/lamination-loss-after-strike/</a></p><p><a href="https://www.comsol.com/blogs/electroplating-u-s-mint-makes-penny/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.comsol.com/blogs/electroplating-u-s-mint-makes-penny/" rel="nofollow">https://www.comsol.com/blogs/electroplating-u-s-mint-makes-penny/</a>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in