Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;DieVarietyNews, post: 1020840, member: 27410&quot;]Thanks Mike for replying and providing your expertise.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I acquired this coin from a well-known and highly respected major mint error dealer.&nbsp; However, the dealer did not mention anything about the other date being visible on the coin and described the coin only as a 1999 Lincoln cent &quot;Double-Struck In Collar with Rotation&quot; mint error.</p><p><br /></p><p>When I received the coin I was able to examine in more detail and I quickly noticed that it also exhibited the underlying date and that it didn&#039;t appear to match up properly to the last digit 9.&nbsp; Additionally, I noticed that the die markers on the second strike did not match to the die markers on the first strike. This makes sense since the two strikes are from two different dies with each die being a different date. I posted photos of the coin here and you know the rest of the story.</p><p><br /></p><p>I believe it would be fair to say that probably the value of this coin has significantly increased.</p><p><br /></p><p>Billy[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in