Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by Coinblaster, Sep 19, 2020.
Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.
Is it rim restricted design duplication Restricted to the face struck by the hammer die
Die flow line
Oh this is the other error I thought it could be
It can't be a broken letter on an edge die, a quarter has a reeded edge, not lettered. Just damage as stated.
Take some time and think this through. Which design element on the reverse has the same size and shape of the mark on your coin? Why is there 1 bold mark but no other adjacent design elements along the rim? How is it possible for a die strike to leave displaced metal?
To paraphrase tge 14th century Franciscan monk and philosopher William of Ockham - the simplest explanation is usually the correct explanation. Do you think it could be PMD from a hit?
http://www.error-ref.com/rim-restricted-second-strikes/ Here's a site that explains rim restricted second strike it explains what I think happen to this coin
If it was due to the die bouncing the lightly striking the rim, why is the mark bold, yet there are no other design elements adjacent to it? Go back and review the pics on error-ref.com
From 1996 through January 2011 edge lettering was used at the Philadelphia mint its possible this is how the D got onto the edge could of been a possible mint error there
Not possible. Edge lettering was not used on quarters. This can only happen on coins with edge lettering such as the presidential dollars.
I thought the 2007 Presidential Dollars were the first modern coin to use edge lettering.
Where did you read from 1996 ?
==> https://atlantagoldandcoin.com/edge-lettering-in-u-s-coinage/#:~:text=Several types of U.S. coins,and half-dollars in 1794.
Separate names with a comma.