Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Alex G, post: 3025223, member: 93681&quot;][ATTACH]752947[/ATTACH] Some how, I just managed to get your reply on to the very area I need to address my question.&nbsp; As you can see, I&#039;m rather new at this and am learning as I go alone.&nbsp; Be that as it may, I&#039;m glad I stumbled across your site in that just tonight I came across this dime (shown above) and am not sure what&#039;s going on with it.&nbsp; I&#039;m hoping you would be so kind as to answer my questions about it.&nbsp; Seeing your photo above of your copper stuck planchet, I now understand what I have isn&#039;t like that.&nbsp; I don&#039;t think it was acid dipped, nor do I believe it looks this way do to environmental conditions.&nbsp; What I now believe is, that it&#039;s missing a clad layer in that, the entire coin is smooth and cleanly imprinted and looks like a regular dime, except, that it&#039;s this weird dark grey color on both sides.&nbsp; Could this be a cladless dime and, would you tell me if this error would make it valuable.&nbsp; Thank you!</p><p>Alex</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>My price range was referring to either a struck cladless core, shown above, or a foreign copper planchet. I honestly don&#039;t know if such a coin existed for the year in question, but they do in some other years. They tend to be more valuable than similar colored foreign blanks, it appears.[/QUOTE][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in