This penny looks like it could be 1995-D 1¢ WDDO-001 (from http://www.doubleddie.com/506234.html) to me, but I've been wrong every other time so far so I look forward to all your input!
Sorry but this is not a Doubled Die. The size of the design elements are still normal . You will see these type of lines form on the numbers and letters as the die ages
Okay. Thanks. Then let me ask this question: Even though the coin is too damaged to see the separation, would this second 1968-D be indicative of being a 1968-D WWHO-001? Side by side with another 1968-D:
I've been using a $28 USB microscope from Amazon with a $6 flexible lamp from Family Dollar; if I had to buy it all over again, I'd pick a microscope with better resolution than 640x480, but it's better than nothing. Since my last post, I changed bulbs to a smaller watt "clear" bulb and have had much better results. Reduced glare makes it much easier to see what's going on. That's the "Best of" doubled die, true -- but I was thinking something like WDDO-2, which is pictured as the following: Much less pronounced. However, thank you guys very much for the information and giving me a lot to chew on -- threads like these may seem mundane for you all, but they help someone like me learn a lot and allow me to be much more discerning in the future. In retrospect, I agree that these coins have worthless (or no) doubling. Just wanted to clear some things up.
I like those minor hard to see doubled dies. It is a challenge to find them for sure. The 1990's Denver doubled dies are very scarce. The Denver crew has better die makers, and quality control. I have been searching at least 3 boxes (5 usually) per month for 3 years and have only found 1 1990's DDR, and no DDO's. Yours is just a normal cent. I have found more of the 1980's Denver DDO's, and 1970, 1960's.
Can you tell me more about your set-up? I assume it plugs into an iPhone or IPad. It takes great close-ups but what do you use for photoing entire coins.? I am really interested in getting started with coin photos but don't want to buy an expensive SLR and lens set-up. This looks like the real deal. Thanks - Rick