1991 Washington quarter clad layer missing?

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by AirborneReams, Nov 2, 2020.

  1. potty dollar 1878

    potty dollar 1878 Well-Known Member

    why are you yelling!!! woke me up lol.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Charles Judd

    Charles Judd New Member

    I believe this 1991 quarter is the real deal because I have one that actually looks copper.
     
  4. Charles Judd

    Charles Judd New Member

  5. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    What does the reverse side look like?
     
  6. Charles Judd

    Charles Judd New Member

  7. Charles Judd

    Charles Judd New Member

    When I get home I'll take a picture of the back of the quarter so you can see that it's copper eating even the edges are copper
     
  8. Charles Judd

    Charles Judd New Member

    Here is the back.
     

    Attached Files:

  9. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    My opinion Charles is that it is just toned.
    I don't see anything that says a clad layer is missing. What is the weight?
     
    SensibleSal66 likes this.
  10. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    Just environmental toning.
    Here is a legitimate example:
    missing clad.jpg
     
    paddyman98 likes this.
  11. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    Your quarter is just toning to the Cupronickel clad layer.
    A true Missing Clad layer usually occurs just on one side. Whatever side the Planchet that's missing the clad layer will determine how it will be struck..

    Here's an example from my collection
    3019836-003.JPG
     
  12. Charles Judd

    Charles Judd New Member

    Weighing in at 4.6 g
     
  13. Charles Judd

    Charles Judd New Member

    This is a 1944 Mercury dime. What's full bands. It's in excellent condition.
     

    Attached Files:

  14. Charles Judd

    Charles Judd New Member

    I would say MS 68
     
  15. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    Full Bands? No way!
    Obviously worn on the bands.
     
  16. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    Seems to be a rolled thin planchet. The surfaces definitely aren't coppery enough.
    Missing one layer of cladding removes approximately 15% of the weight. This is not an average but from known examples. Yours is close but too light. Missing two layers would be 30% of the weight. And that doesn't work either.
    Odds are yours is from a rolled thin planchet.
    Struck on dime stock is also not correct. The 70D'S rolled on dime stock weigh 4.24g roughly.
    Show the third side (edge) maybe we can help figure out what the reason is.
     
  17. Charles Judd

    Charles Judd New Member

    So it's just a junker
     
  18. Charles Judd

    Charles Judd New Member

    This is a 1977 ebenheiser dollar coin.
    What Ms do you think it is.
     

    Attached Files:

  19. Charles Judd

    Charles Judd New Member

    It's very little worn on the middle band
     
  20. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    Your Mercury dime is in AU condition at best.
    Here is a FSB Merc.
    upload_2023-12-24_9-46-38.jpeg
     
  21. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    @Charles Judd Thus is an example from my collection as to what the bands are and must look like without magnifying the coin. There are 3 sets of two bands, top, middle and bottom of the torch. To be Full Bands all of the bands need to look like this. The last photo is a closeup of the bottom bands.
    A3C45191-7CFE-49F4-BE3B-B00D38BF5F77.jpeg 9F566B4B-59AB-4F01-BB0C-F5DCB4B11545.jpeg 8B22D443-9634-40F5-9C9C-4B93B8D18554.jpeg
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page