Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;cpm9ball, post: 2739387, member: 24633&quot;]I&#039;m guessing that you are referring to the 1990 &quot;No S&quot; <b>proof</b> Lincoln. There are a few years between 1968 &amp; 1990 where one denomination or another was mistakenly included in the set without the San Francisco (S) mintmark. It is these proof coins that are more valuable, but their greatest value is when they are left, intact, in the proof set. It is important to remember that all of the business strike coins produced at the Philadelphia Mint normally do not have a mintmark.</p><p><br /></p><p>It might be good for you to buy a copy of the Red Book</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]625039[/ATTACH]</p><p>(Note: It is published annually) because it contains a lot of information you are not likely to find elsewhere.</p><p><br /></p><p>Chris[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in