Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;cmelton, post: 1567186, member: 41913&quot;]I&#039;ve decided to sell some coins and I could use a little advice.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>I searched the internet for references to the 1989 P no mint mark Washington quarter and found a thread on this forum.&nbsp; One of the replies to that thread was from a gentleman who worked in Greenville NC and obtained a large number of these coins while working in a laundromat in 1989.&nbsp; Another reply speculated that as it was thought the coin was the result of a grease filled die that perhaps partial mint mark coins existed as well.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>As it happens I worked at the movie theatre in Greenville NC in 1989 as a ticket seller and obtained 8 of these coins myself. 2 of my coins indeed show a partially visable mint mark under magnification.&nbsp; Im not an expert but I think this is pretty strong evidence that these coins were indeed the result of a grease filled die. </p><p><br /></p><p>&nbsp;I know the coins have no where near the value they had in 89/90 (yeah missed the boat on that one =/) but given the speculation Harry Foreman made into these coins and the splash they made at the time my question is this.&nbsp; Do you guys think these coins would be more valuable sold individually or sold together as a lot documenting the various stages of the grease filled impressions?</p><p><br /></p><p>Also found in the same rolls of quarters straight from the bank in 1989 were 2 quarter blanks. Do these have numismatic value? Whether they do or do not should they too be included in a lot? (I dunno call it&nbsp; a &quot;They had a really bad QA year at the Philadelphia Mint&quot; collection lol)</p><p><br /></p><p>Any thoughts and guidance would be appreciated.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in