Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
1989-P 10c DDR-001?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="jay4202472000, post: 2816860, member: 42573"]That is <b><i><u>THE</u></i></b> key die marker on coins that had hand punched mint marks. Die markers come and go throughout the die's life (die stages), however the mint mark placement will always remain constant. The only exception is if the coin is a DDR and later on the obverse die was changed. A good example of this situation is 1968D-DDR-001. Stage C on Variety Vista (VV) has a new obverse die. Notice the mint mark of Stage C is in a different location from Stages A & B.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://varietyvista.com/01b%20LC%20Doubled%20Dies%20Vol%202/1968DDDR001.htm" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://varietyvista.com/01b%20LC%20Doubled%20Dies%20Vol%202/1968DDDR001.htm" rel="nofollow">http://varietyvista.com/01b LC Doubled Dies Vol 2/1968DDDR001.htm</a></p><p><br /></p><p>The example I own is a Stage C. Both of Coppercoins stages are from the first obverse die, even the Late Die State images (LDS).</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.coppercoins.com/diesearch.php" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.coppercoins.com/diesearch.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.coppercoins.com/diesearch.php</a></p><p><br /></p><p>So if you had a VV Stage C & checked Coppercoins, the mint mark placement wouldn't match, even though it's the same DDR.</p><p><br /></p><p>Wexler's is the same, but as you can see, he doesn't have an image of the date & MM. I love Wexler's site, but that's the only bad thing I can say about it. There are a lot of older doubled dies listed without an image of the date & MM. On heavily circulated coins where all markers are wiped out, that MM placement could confirm or prove it isn't the doubled die you are looking at.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://doubleddie.com/814660.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://doubleddie.com/814660.html" rel="nofollow">http://doubleddie.com/814660.html</a></p><p><br /></p><p>I was studying my 1968D-DDR-001 last night while entering it into my variety spreadsheet. That's the only reason I could just pull that example out, lol. Just keep this in mind and use all references handy.</p><p><br /></p><p>This has nothing to do with the MM placement, but another example I have run into where a die change happens mid-run is 1925S-RPM-001. The reverse is changed at Stage E:</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://varietyvista.com/02a%20LC%20RPMs%20Vol%201/1925SRPM001.htm" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://varietyvista.com/02a%20LC%20RPMs%20Vol%201/1925SRPM001.htm" rel="nofollow">http://varietyvista.com/02a LC RPMs Vol 1/1925SRPM001.htm</a>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="jay4202472000, post: 2816860, member: 42573"]That is [B][I][U]THE[/U][/I][/B] key die marker on coins that had hand punched mint marks. Die markers come and go throughout the die's life (die stages), however the mint mark placement will always remain constant. The only exception is if the coin is a DDR and later on the obverse die was changed. A good example of this situation is 1968D-DDR-001. Stage C on Variety Vista (VV) has a new obverse die. Notice the mint mark of Stage C is in a different location from Stages A & B. [url]http://varietyvista.com/01b%20LC%20Doubled%20Dies%20Vol%202/1968DDDR001.htm[/url] The example I own is a Stage C. Both of Coppercoins stages are from the first obverse die, even the Late Die State images (LDS). [url]http://www.coppercoins.com/diesearch.php[/url] So if you had a VV Stage C & checked Coppercoins, the mint mark placement wouldn't match, even though it's the same DDR. Wexler's is the same, but as you can see, he doesn't have an image of the date & MM. I love Wexler's site, but that's the only bad thing I can say about it. There are a lot of older doubled dies listed without an image of the date & MM. On heavily circulated coins where all markers are wiped out, that MM placement could confirm or prove it isn't the doubled die you are looking at. [url]http://doubleddie.com/814660.html[/url] I was studying my 1968D-DDR-001 last night while entering it into my variety spreadsheet. That's the only reason I could just pull that example out, lol. Just keep this in mind and use all references handy. This has nothing to do with the MM placement, but another example I have run into where a die change happens mid-run is 1925S-RPM-001. The reverse is changed at Stage E: [url]http://varietyvista.com/02a%20LC%20RPMs%20Vol%201/1925SRPM001.htm[/url][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
1989-P 10c DDR-001?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...