Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;John Burgess, post: 4869706, member: 105098&quot;]<i>No offense but you have to be more specific than that in your question. Which RPM from which cataloging system are you comparing it to? Looking I had found 1989-D RPM-001 from varietyvista, this isn&#039;t it. </i></p><p><i>References found also to a RPM-003 and an RPM-009. I am assuming somewhere there are at least 6 more RPMs, unless someone just made up numbers along the way that aren&#039;t part of a known cataloging system.</i></p><p><i>Variety Vista</i></p><p><i>Coneca</i></p><p><i>Cherry Pickers </i></p><p><i>ect.</i></p><p><br /></p><p>It should look EXACTLY the same as their example picture with more or less wear from where ever you are looking at, because the mintmark was re-punched into the die, so every coin struck with that die will look the same.</p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;m really not trying to vex anyone or be difficult, it&#039;s just no way to tell what you are comparing it to to make your determination except for the most common and readily available RPM-001 and your picture isn&#039;t it.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in