Hello folks just came across this. Looking for info on the following pictures. The "L" and "U" looks split on top and rest is mess. Looked on Wexler's Doubledie and a couple of more forms. Thanks for any and all help. Sorry 85-D.
Thanks guys, was leaning that way except like I was saying the split "L" and "U" below that and the "S' at the end. All three are show splits on them and thinking DD.
Some of these coins were plated in a 90% copper bath. This could be one of them. would this be considered a mint error? Ask @paddyman98.
Doing a little more research I've come up with something similar, the 1983 DDR. The only thing similar is the E-Pluribus Unum. The One cent Union is not doubled. Could this maybe be a class 4. Not sure how they were stamped as they transitioned around that time. Thanks again.
This and this an 83DDR do not look the same. A class 4 Doubled die has full doubling on every device, if one area of the die is stronger and other areas are not seen then it is either a different class or it falls into the most common category of worthless doubling. I would encourage you to read through this http://doubleddie.com/144801.html and then read this. http://doubleddie.com/58222.html PS your coin is text book DDD. Here is the full reverse of the EPU that I posted above.
It's not worn in one area. That is a known and well documented weak spot. It is caused by the design of the coin.
