Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
1986 Lincoln - Help me correctly identify the condition(s)?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Spark1951, post: 6501920, member: 90692"][USER=118590]@PennyRich[/USER] ...the ridge ring is a hallmark of any overused die for lots of dates. Zincolns do not have a monopoly on ridge rings but they are so notoriously badly made their reputation suffers mightily. The granular surface on Zincolns, or perhaps the plating blisters, along with multitudinous problems with strike defects like split-plate doubling and scalloped letters and numerals would be better hallmarks. There are 2 reasons why this is so:</p><p><br /></p><p>1. The US Mint was trying to produce a cheaper cent, and man oh man, did they ever! In producing this cheaper, inferior cent, they had to change a lot of processes and getting their suppliers to learn how to copper plate zinc planchets took many, many years to do. They still make crappy coins.</p><p><br /></p><p>2. In tandem with making a cheaper cent, the Mint, loaded with freshly coated slugs, proceeded to crank out millions and millions of them <b><i>each year. </i></b> But, when a die pair wore out, they pushed the production beyond normal, resulting in prevalent strike errors and many a deteriorated coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>WYSIWYG. (What you see is what you get). There should be no surprise when you find one with a ridge ring.</p><p>...jmho...Spark[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Spark1951, post: 6501920, member: 90692"][USER=118590]@PennyRich[/USER] ...the ridge ring is a hallmark of any overused die for lots of dates. Zincolns do not have a monopoly on ridge rings but they are so notoriously badly made their reputation suffers mightily. The granular surface on Zincolns, or perhaps the plating blisters, along with multitudinous problems with strike defects like split-plate doubling and scalloped letters and numerals would be better hallmarks. There are 2 reasons why this is so: 1. The US Mint was trying to produce a cheaper cent, and man oh man, did they ever! In producing this cheaper, inferior cent, they had to change a lot of processes and getting their suppliers to learn how to copper plate zinc planchets took many, many years to do. They still make crappy coins. 2. In tandem with making a cheaper cent, the Mint, loaded with freshly coated slugs, proceeded to crank out millions and millions of them [B][I]each year. [/I][/B] But, when a die pair wore out, they pushed the production beyond normal, resulting in prevalent strike errors and many a deteriorated coin. WYSIWYG. (What you see is what you get). There should be no surprise when you find one with a ridge ring. ...jmho...Spark[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
1986 Lincoln - Help me correctly identify the condition(s)?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...