Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Kevin Mader, post: 6452269, member: 106826&quot;]If you CRH long enough, you&#039;ll find that the 1983 D with the sunken area adjacent the mintmark is common enough.&nbsp; There are a few other dates amongst the LWCs and LMCs that have a similar, sunken affect.&nbsp; No added value for that.&nbsp; On the reverse, I see some split plating that&#039;s experiencing the effects of hydrozincite...or zinc rot as folks say. As the hydrozincite grows, the plating further separates.&nbsp; And I agree with the others, this particular specimen has typical plating anomalies going on with blisters/bubbles.&nbsp; A good educational piece, but unfortunately, just a spender.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in