Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
1983c
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="bhp3rd, post: 819123, member: 16510"]<b>It is not, I admit it does look somewhat like a "D" but</b></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p> </p><p>It is not, I admit it does look somewhat like a "D" but if you understand the minting process the logic is not there.</p><p>First, it's "P" mint coin so no "D" punch was near it, (the die).</p><p>Second it's <b>way too big</b> for the normally used "D" on these year cents.</p><p>Third, just because you think you see no erosion it is there and that's the answer as you already have been informed - the erosion is under the copper plating. This is the first "full" year of copper coated zinc cents. They still were working on problems with the copper coating adhering to the zinc core.</p><p>Forth, the image (if you think it's a dropped letter) is <b>way to big</b> for any device found on any Lincoln cent.</p><p> </p><p>As I have said many times on CoinTalk we do not just make determinations based on what we see or think we see or don't think. We make them with a knowledge of the minting process first, and then see if it could be possible, not the other way around. It must fit some portion (or problem with) minting procedures. If it does not it is most likley not possible and therefore cannot be explained - if then it cannot be expained it is not reality.</p><p>We see hundreds and thousands of unusal things on Lincoln Cents but we don't, at that point jump to a conclusion - the conclusion needs to proved.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="bhp3rd, post: 819123, member: 16510"][b]It is not, I admit it does look somewhat like a "D" but[/b] It is not, I admit it does look somewhat like a "D" but if you understand the minting process the logic is not there. First, it's "P" mint coin so no "D" punch was near it, (the die). Second it's [B]way too big[/B] for the normally used "D" on these year cents. Third, just because you think you see no erosion it is there and that's the answer as you already have been informed - the erosion is under the copper plating. This is the first "full" year of copper coated zinc cents. They still were working on problems with the copper coating adhering to the zinc core. Forth, the image (if you think it's a dropped letter) is [B]way to big[/B] for any device found on any Lincoln cent. As I have said many times on CoinTalk we do not just make determinations based on what we see or think we see or don't think. We make them with a knowledge of the minting process first, and then see if it could be possible, not the other way around. It must fit some portion (or problem with) minting procedures. If it does not it is most likley not possible and therefore cannot be explained - if then it cannot be expained it is not reality. We see hundreds and thousands of unusal things on Lincoln Cents but we don't, at that point jump to a conclusion - the conclusion needs to proved.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
1983c
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...