Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;davidh, post: 1234881, member: 15062&quot;]So you&#039;re saying that the clad layers wore faster than the soft copper core.&nbsp; OK, following your thoughts, when the coin was minted both the soft copper core and the thin clad layers were reeded.&nbsp; Then with years of wear the clad layers&#039; reeding was worn off, leaving the copper less affected, but still retaining the reeds.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>How is it that, with all three layers having reeds, only the two outer layers wore down, leaving the inner layer much less worn and still having reeding?&nbsp; That&#039;s a mighty selective wear pattern. </p><p><br /></p><p>As I see it, your theory holds up only if the original reeding was much deeper on the copper core than on the outer layers.&nbsp; How could that have happened?</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH]131807.vB[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>There&#039;s <u>always</u> another explanation.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in