Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Ordinary Fool, post: 2791997, member: 85318&quot;]If you take a napkin&#039;s straight edge to your screen on the D&#039;s upright, and hopefully on a big monitor and not on a tiny handheld, you&#039;ll see the MM may not be placed exactly as the 101&#039;s MM is. </p><p><br /></p><p>Now I realize your shot isn&#039;t taken from directly over head and to do this comparison I&#039;m talking about, that is required. Doing so will be a bit tricky with what you have to work with.</p><p><br /></p><p>From an angle of course, you get distortion due to disappearing vantage points and those lines of convergence.</p><p><br /></p><p>Common to verify is to triangulate from three key points from the date to the MM.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://varietyvista.com/01b%20LC%20Doubled%20Dies%20Vol%202/1983-D%20Photos/1983DDDO001b%20date.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /> </p><p><br /></p><p>Really amazing progress on your part. </p><p>Wanting it is 95% of the battle.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in