Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;CygnusCC, post: 7693305, member: 120299&quot;]Sorry Bentley, I need to chop up your post in order to answer. My apologies if I&#039;m cutting sentences in half or missing context.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Yup</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Honestly, I&#039;m not sure which combinations were intended to occur and which just occurred because of chance.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>No idea, but I think that&#039;s one of the reasons the finding was initially controversial. I notice that even the article was written in a defensive tone - I&#039;m sure Ken probably expected challenges.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Maybe so, but the question is then: what are the odds of finding one?</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I seem to recall that paddyman had a list of total Lincoln cents struck over the years, but don&#039;t recall what it said about 1943. I&#039;m pretty sure there are more than 40 or 50 left, though. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie5" alt=":confused:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;m not sure, but I do recall there have apparently been allegations of intentional mint errors and variations created by mint employees for years. I don&#039;t know enough about it to speculate, to be honest.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in