Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Way, post: 4953795, member: 115337&quot;]Plain and simple I think I just have too much magnification. Ha ha im actually putting high grade sets together in all denominations as well as seeking verities in all denominations as well. I don&#039;t discriminate but this98th way I don&#039;t get bored with it either because I can just search dimes one week, quarters next week ECT ECT. The T is a huge crack that has opened up along the line of the die markes it left. Fallow the line I have marked on the other picture and it runs right along them. Thats what made me think it may not still be in its original form. Im not sayin im right im just trying to figure out my where I went wrong in my approach. I agree the knotching on the R isnt as distinguished as mine. I thought it was the indention at the top of the R looked correct as well however I thought mine prob just more circulated and worn. The E seemed spot on with the lines but seemed worn down too from circulation. I even thought the characteristics of the E just above line was a mach. I am trying too hard huh?? Ha ha[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in