Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
1975 Jefferson Nickel FS ???
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Insider, post: 2504965, member: 24314"]You are correct; however, as I posted, when I was doing research for an article on FBL, I believe (as I posted) the CAC photo of a FBL coin did not meet BOTH their and the PCGS published standard! I believed it was CAC because at the time I wrote the article, I spoke with John about it. I guess I'll just need to look now. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie3" alt=":(" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> I see that this aspect of grading is only addressed topically in your book (which I recommend) without any specific criteria given.</p><p><br /></p><p>BTW, I never heard of "high point pitting" until I read your book. As with anything, new comers/or newly published authors to the hobby are free to assign their own "names" to characteristics they see on coins. Perhaps your "name" will catch on with our younger collectors as the term I coined in the 1970's (OPSI) to describe the "original planchet surface imperfections" that remain on a struck coin (in ANY area of weakness - <span style="color: #006600">including the high points</span>) has not. </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><b><span style="color: #ff0000">EDIT</span></b>: Just looked at CAC website. <span style="color: #b30000">What I posted was correct</span>; however, the photos appear to have been changed from the ones I remember a while back (otherwise - just fading memory). Note that FBL14 is <span style="color: #b300b3">NOT FBL! </span><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)">IMO the BS about "too minor to matter: allows for "wiggle room." A hit is a hit! Also note (</span><span style="color: #006600">as you posted</span><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)">) that the CAC standard is based on the looser PGGS standards. One posted FBL coin with a deep hit on the top bands is </span><span style="color: #b300b3">not</span><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)"> FBL at ANY OTHER TPGS!</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)">We all know grading is subjective and NOW it appears that over time, the "experts" are trying their best to make the designations subjective too! So sad... </span>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Insider, post: 2504965, member: 24314"]You are correct; however, as I posted, when I was doing research for an article on FBL, I believe (as I posted) the CAC photo of a FBL coin did not meet BOTH their and the PCGS published standard! I believed it was CAC because at the time I wrote the article, I spoke with John about it. I guess I'll just need to look now. :( I see that this aspect of grading is only addressed topically in your book (which I recommend) without any specific criteria given. BTW, I never heard of "high point pitting" until I read your book. As with anything, new comers/or newly published authors to the hobby are free to assign their own "names" to characteristics they see on coins. Perhaps your "name" will catch on with our younger collectors as the term I coined in the 1970's (OPSI) to describe the "original planchet surface imperfections" that remain on a struck coin (in ANY area of weakness - [COLOR=#006600]including the high points[/COLOR]) has not. [B][COLOR=#ff0000]EDIT[/COLOR][/B]: Just looked at CAC website. [COLOR=#b30000]What I posted was correct[/COLOR]; however, the photos appear to have been changed from the ones I remember a while back (otherwise - just fading memory). Note that FBL14 is [COLOR=#b300b3]NOT FBL! [/COLOR][COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 0)]IMO the BS about "too minor to matter: allows for "wiggle room." A hit is a hit! Also note ([/COLOR][COLOR=#006600]as you posted[/COLOR][COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 0)]) that the CAC standard is based on the looser PGGS standards. One posted FBL coin with a deep hit on the top bands is [/COLOR][COLOR=#b300b3]not[/COLOR][COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 0)] FBL at ANY OTHER TPGS! We all know grading is subjective and NOW it appears that over time, the "experts" are trying their best to make the designations subjective too! So sad... [/COLOR][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
1975 Jefferson Nickel FS ???
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...