1975 Jefferson Nickel FS ???

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Rick Stachowski, Aug 28, 2016.

  1. Rick Stachowski

    Rick Stachowski Motor City Car Capital

    Do you Guys & Gals think it's a FS ?
    A005 - 20160828_081723 (2)-vert.jpg

    A005 - 20160828_081723 (3)-vert.jpg

    10d.jpg

    Here's an image from Pcgs on a FS ..
    10e.jpg
     
    Last edited: Aug 28, 2016
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. kSigSteve

    kSigSteve Active Member

    I believe the mark under column 3 knocks it out. I also see some blending of the steps under column 2.
     
  4. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    I think the hits keep it from being FS.
     
    Coinlover67 likes this.
  5. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    I am not seeing full separation under the 3rd column plus under the fourth they look a little mushy.
     
  6. Rick Stachowski

    Rick Stachowski Motor City Car Capital

    Here's another image of the step ..
    10c.jpg
     
    Last edited: Aug 28, 2016
  7. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    It says Ct error
     
  8. Rick Stachowski

    Rick Stachowski Motor City Car Capital

    I'm trying to downsize the image for better viewing ...
     
  9. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    1. The large mark that crosses all of the steps, just right of the third colum, immediately rules this out as FS.

    2. The top steps under the fourth column look incomplete, from your pictures.

    3. The steps under the first column show weakness in your pictures, but I'm not sure if that is a shadow or actual bridging.

    For these three reasons, your coin is not FS.
     
    TJ1952 likes this.
  10. Rick Stachowski

    Rick Stachowski Motor City Car Capital

    I don't think the hit will hurt it, even the image from Pcgs has hits in the stairs ....
     
  11. TJ1952

    TJ1952 Well-Known Member

    My understanding of FS is the step area MUST be clear of ANY hits, scratches or other post-strike impairments that disrupt the lines. The lines must NOT be disrupted. At least that's what I'm looking for.
     
    ldhair likes this.
  12. Rick Stachowski

    Rick Stachowski Motor City Car Capital

    Well then, Pcgs must have it wrong ..
    10e.jpg
     
  13. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    [sarcasm]

    PCGS got a strike designation wrong? Shocking!

    [/end sarcasm]
     
  14. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    It's a matter how many hits and how large they are.
     
  15. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    I didn't think it was the hits on the steps. But, more so, the depth and separation of the steps. On your Nickel it doesn't seem that there is even a hint of the fifth step under the third column.
     
  16. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    PCGS is never wrong. Just ask the people who have been banned by PCGS.

    Chris
     
    Rick Stachowski likes this.
  17. TJ1952

    TJ1952 Well-Known Member

    I understand your point completely. I am the farthest thing from a professional grader. I guess the bottom-line is: Unfortunately, it's all subjective. If I as a laymen can say all 5 or 6 lines are complete and uninterrupted without wear, that would be my starting point. This much disagreement in our conversations would tell me something.
     
  18. Rick Stachowski

    Rick Stachowski Motor City Car Capital

    10e.jpg Here's another image, I took lots of them this morning ...
     
    Last edited: Aug 28, 2016
  19. TJ1952

    TJ1952 Well-Known Member

    Great picture! Bad steps! IMO
     
  20. ToughCOINS

    ToughCOINS Dealer Member Moderator

  21. TJ1952

    TJ1952 Well-Known Member

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page