Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
1974 quarter with neat toning
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Kevin Mader, post: 7346716, member: 106826"]Collecting is about what you like and what satisfies your needs.</p><p><br /></p><p>As noted by fellow enthusiasts, they are offering you a more broadly established and accepted standard for appearances. This might be what you are after, but since it is an individual preference, only you can know. Regarding your subject coin, there are folks who would find that appearance appealing. Most I suspect would not. But there are folks who collect these coins...might even pay a small premium for. Here's something to consider:</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Low Ball Sets:</b> There are folks who will put together a low ball set of worn coins with the aim of a set with a consistent worn appearance. This is often done where there are a number of expensive coins in the series. Rather than a mix of fair to uncirculated coins, they aim for a set with continuity in mind. Sometimes the challenge is to build a set under a certain dollar amount. I saw one challenge to build a set of Buffalo Nickels for under $100. The fellow enthusiast had to be deliberate about purchases since there are a few normally pricey coins in the series. Yet he did it.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Environmental Sets:</b> I saw a CRH enthusiast build a set of Jefferson Nickels that looked like your quarter above. It took a long time since his objective was to find 'cameo' appearance like you see on the reverse of your quarter. The effect of his collection was really pretty incredible. Seeing dozens of Jefferson nickels in that condition caused the album to pop. As a result, I started laying away nickels like that to build my own.</p><p><br /></p><p>What would either set be worth? I'm not sure that was the point of it for either person. Instead, they saw a challenge and built collections to share with others. They had success on many levels. So to each...their own...collect what you like and don't worry about anything. On the other note, if you are trying to develop a more common understanding about what appearances are more desirable, then by all means listen to the members here offering input and do your own sleuthing to arrive at your definition. You should do fine![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Kevin Mader, post: 7346716, member: 106826"]Collecting is about what you like and what satisfies your needs. As noted by fellow enthusiasts, they are offering you a more broadly established and accepted standard for appearances. This might be what you are after, but since it is an individual preference, only you can know. Regarding your subject coin, there are folks who would find that appearance appealing. Most I suspect would not. But there are folks who collect these coins...might even pay a small premium for. Here's something to consider: [B]Low Ball Sets:[/B] There are folks who will put together a low ball set of worn coins with the aim of a set with a consistent worn appearance. This is often done where there are a number of expensive coins in the series. Rather than a mix of fair to uncirculated coins, they aim for a set with continuity in mind. Sometimes the challenge is to build a set under a certain dollar amount. I saw one challenge to build a set of Buffalo Nickels for under $100. The fellow enthusiast had to be deliberate about purchases since there are a few normally pricey coins in the series. Yet he did it. [B]Environmental Sets:[/B] I saw a CRH enthusiast build a set of Jefferson Nickels that looked like your quarter above. It took a long time since his objective was to find 'cameo' appearance like you see on the reverse of your quarter. The effect of his collection was really pretty incredible. Seeing dozens of Jefferson nickels in that condition caused the album to pop. As a result, I started laying away nickels like that to build my own. What would either set be worth? I'm not sure that was the point of it for either person. Instead, they saw a challenge and built collections to share with others. They had success on many levels. So to each...their own...collect what you like and don't worry about anything. On the other note, if you are trying to develop a more common understanding about what appearances are more desirable, then by all means listen to the members here offering input and do your own sleuthing to arrive at your definition. You should do fine![/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
1974 quarter with neat toning
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...