Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;jay4202472000, post: 2842357, member: 42573&quot;]I honestly believe it&#039;s just a damaged S punch.&nbsp; Notice there isn&#039;t any separation lines on the S itself, or above or below, just the lines inside the lower curve.&nbsp; Here are three proof RPMs with the same lines within the lower curve, and the stuff going on in the lower curve has nothing to do with the repunching described:</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://varietyvista.com/02b%20LC%20RPMs%20Vol%202/1971SRPM003.htm" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://varietyvista.com/02b%20LC%20RPMs%20Vol%202/1971SRPM003.htm" rel="nofollow">http://varietyvista.com/02b LC RPMs Vol 2/1971SRPM003.htm</a></p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://varietyvista.com/02b%20LC%20RPMs%20Vol%202/1971SRPM004.htm" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://varietyvista.com/02b%20LC%20RPMs%20Vol%202/1971SRPM004.htm" rel="nofollow">http://varietyvista.com/02b LC RPMs Vol 2/1971SRPM004.htm</a></p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://varietyvista.com/02b%20LC%20RPMs%20Vol%202/1971SRPM005.htm" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://varietyvista.com/02b%20LC%20RPMs%20Vol%202/1971SRPM005.htm" rel="nofollow">http://varietyvista.com/02b LC RPMs Vol 2/1971SRPM005.htm</a>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in