1970's PROOF SETS

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by bwhiteside59, Jan 26, 2012.

  1. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    clad I have always agreed with your general premise. If you think back over all of the years that you and I have known each other, and it's what 12-13 years now, you should be able to remember that. I can remember a day when you and I were probably about the only ones on the planet who DID think that way. Of course that's going back to before we knew each other. And like you I have no doubt that the day will come.

    But it is almost a certainty I won't be alive to see it. And it is a likelihood that you won't either my friend. But those who are around 50-60, 100 years from now. Yeah, they'll see it ;)

    But that's the way it's always been and probably always will be. In the 1860's nobody, or very few, ever thought the Proofs of the day or the business strikes for that matter, would ever be worth anything. But the few who did saved the coins, and those who came after them continued to save them, as did those who came after them. And today look at what we have with those coins. It can all be summed up with the ending line of a poem I wrote many years ago -

    That the answers lie waiting in the echoes of time
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. yakpoo

    yakpoo Member

    As I've stated in other threads, I've charted historical coins values over time and find that at approximately the seventy (70) year mark, most coins see a noticeable bump in price. That's about the same time the nicest examples make an even greater jump in price. If you can cherry-pick the finest examples of 1965-1970 coins now and hold them until 2035-2040, I believe you will be handsomely rewarded. :thumb: I like to cherry-pick the early clads now...while prices are low. Hopefully someone in the family will take over where I leave off and appreciate the effort.

    EDIT: ...and what Doug just said!
    :thumb:


     
  4. bwhiteside59

    bwhiteside59 Member

    I agree.

    Ben
    Tampa FL
     
  5. TheCoinGeezer

    TheCoinGeezer Senex Bombulum

    70's proof sets are inexpensive and likely to stay that way in the foreseeable future.
    Your best bet is to cherry-pick the deep cameo sets, which can be somewhat of a challenge for the 1970-1972 sets.
     
  6. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Somewhat ? I searched for more years than I care to remember and never found a single one where more than 1 or 2 coins were even cameo, let alone the entire set. And forget deep cameo.
     
  7. BUncirculated

    BUncirculated Well-Known Member

    These have come down in value in the last year and half compared to what they were selling for two years ago.

    FYI, if you have them and want to sell them, do it in a private sale, most dealers I know are not buying them at all. They're too common, and dealers don't want to tie up their funds in them as they know they will have them for some time before someone is interested in purchasing them.
     
  8. TheCoinGeezer

    TheCoinGeezer Senex Bombulum

    I was trying not to discourage the man. :D
    My local B&M guy has 71 and 72 and some 80s proof sets in his junk box.
    I checked every one of the 71/72 sets and nary a cameo to be found.
     
  9. jello

    jello Not Expert★NormL®

    My 2cents

    :thumb:I agree with Doug/GDJMSP!
    there not any point he has not cover all questions on this thread.
    but do hope to find a PR-69Deep Cameo that graded 100% right.
    Pr-70 Cameo or Deep Cameo in most likely over graded!

     
  10. pumpkinpie

    pumpkinpie what is this I don*t even

    When you start a thread you don't have to say that you "would like to start a discussion"
     
  11. TheCoinGeezer

    TheCoinGeezer Senex Bombulum

    Thank you, Ethan.
    It is reassuring to know that you are ever vigilant and eager to serve as the posting police.
    I can sleep easier now knowing you are ready to pounce on the slightest infraction (imagined or otherwise).
     
  12. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I don't really think that's how he intended it Geezer. You should try giving people credit once in a while.
     
  13. BUncirculated

    BUncirculated Well-Known Member

    Sorry no credit, PayPal only bub 33.gif
     
  14. TheCoinGeezer

    TheCoinGeezer Senex Bombulum

    Oh really? And how else could it be taken? Seemed downright unfriendly and condescending to me.
    In my day those young whippersnappers had respect for their elders.
    But what do I know? ;)
     
  15. sunshineium

    sunshineium Member

    Sooo...anyway...deep cameo? In which years? And why in some years but not others?
     
  16. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    You misunderstand. It's not that no (meaning 0) examples of deep cameo exist, it's that they are so scarce that it is extremely unlikely that you will ever find one - for certain years.

    Here's the deal. All Proof coins, clear back to the beginning, with the exceptions of the Matte and Satin Proofs, were designed to have the cameo effect. The thing that creates the cameo effect is the way the dies are prepared. The fields are polished smooth until they shine like a mirror. The devices, legends, date etc. are made rough by sandblasting, acid etching, or use of a laser. What this does is make the surface of the devices have a very fine pebbled surface. It is this pebbled surface that creates the look of frost on the devices. And it is the contrast of the mirror finish of the fields against the frost finish of the devices that gives us what we call cameo, or deep cameo.

    Now, what happens is this. The first few coins struck with the new Proof dies are all deep cameo. When I say few that may be a hundred or several hundred. But as each additional coin is struck the metal flow of the planchet against the die causes the die to wear. After those first few deep cameo coins are struck the dies exhibit some wear and the next coins struck are cameo. But as the die continues to wear the cameo effect is totally lost because the metal flowing against the die wears that rough, pebbly surface smooth. And then the surface of the devices become brilliant much like the fields.

    Now here's the kicker. Prior to 1973 the mint did not care if all of the Proof coins were cameo or not. As the dies wore they would just keep on striking coins with the worn dies. So what we ended up with was just a few deep cameo coins, a few more cameo coins, and then all the coins struck after that were brilliant.

    But in 1973 the mint changed their policy. From then on, as the dies wore to the point that the coins began to lose the cameo effect, the dies were replaced with new dies, and/or resurfaced dies. So that all of the Proof coins had the cameo effect.

    So, with any Proof coin dated up to and including 1972, it is pretty hard to find a cameo or deep cameo example in an original Proof set. In today's world it is almost impossible because the sets have been so cherry picked over the years.

    Understand ?
     
  17. Kasia

    Kasia Got my learning hat on

    Time passing between events has a way of distorting reality. In the past it wasn't kids showing respect so much as protecting their delicate behinds and simply biding there time until they were adults. Then, lo and behold, came the interwebs and everybody could say things.
     
  18. kookoox10

    kookoox10 ANA #3168546

    Hmmm...so that explains everything. Thanks for the proof history lesson. Have cherrypickers always picked up the pre-73 cameo coins when they were first minted, or is this a recent trend (within the last 10 or so years)?
     
  19. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I'd say it's certainly grown in the past 10-12 years. But I collected original Mint and Proof sets for most of my life, until I quit collecting US coins in 2002. But up until then I had searched through thousands and thousands of original sets at dealer shops and coin shows. It was not unusual for me to search through 500-1000 sets at just 1 coin show.
     
  20. cladking

    cladking Coin Collector


    Great post.

    I suspect that some dies missed the sandblasting back in the old days of proof set making and "know" that not all SMS dies recieved sandblasting. There are examples of SMS coins struck off brand new dies that have no cameo effect at all. This is the main reason SMS cameo cents are so rare.

    There was quite a bit of experimenting going on with SMS dies, planchets, and striking so there are a lot of oddballs in these years. This is probably the cause of the existence of the '64 SMS's since these were still being struck into '65. (I'm not sure this applies to the half dollar though)

    It's true that proof sets and SMS's are heavily cherrypicked now days for cameos but this is just part of the reason they are rare. Remember that only the cameos actually removed from sets affect the incidence of cameos in sets. Sellers simply know to submit cameos or sell them for higher pices. In the old days there were dozens of collecors who knew about cameos each able to look at thousands of sets but now it's thousands of collectors chasing dozens of sets because choice sets aren't usually available. Sometimes heirs will sell valuable cameos as typical sets though so they are still out there.

    '73 is the year that cameos become common but it's '83 before they become almost universal.

    There will be hoards of cameos hitting the market in the future but collectors should remember that these are all quite scarce and generally people simply didn't have access to the numbers of sets required to find significant numbers. There was deep interest in cameos but it wasn't widespread so not even all accumulations were getting searched. Even as late as 1980 there was almost no searching of SMS's going on anywhere. I could find large accumulations that hadn't been searched. Now days you almost have to find original sets to have even the slightest chance or to be very lucky and find a collector's hoard that got to market. Of course it's far easier to buy them as cameos but no one sells them cheap.
     
  21. sunshineium

    sunshineium Member

    That is really interesting! Thanks!

    I'm going to have to go back through my proofs. My mother bought proof sets from '57 to '83 when I was born and then kept buying them after that. It'll be something interesting to look for! (Who am I kidding, they are pretty and I just like looking through them!) :)
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page