1970 S-less matte PF, in circulation?

Discussion in 'What's it Worth' started by Braydon, May 1, 2015.

  1. Braydon

    Braydon Make your own history, with history you can own.

    It's got the squared rim. Very intricate lettering, similar to the other among Proofs I've seen. But why would someone remove it from the original Mint packaging? In possibility thinking it was a Philadelphia? And what's the value of it raw
     

    Attached Files:

    swamp yankee likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Kirkuleez

    Kirkuleez 80 proof

    Philadelphia didn't make any proof in 1970, would have been San Francisco. If it were a proof from San Francisco, it would be worth a couple of dollars if it weren't so heavily impaired. I'm pretty sure that you just have a nicely struck business strike from Philadelphia.
     
    swamp yankee likes this.
  4. Braydon

    Braydon Make your own history, with history you can own.

    Unless of course; it's the variety. S intended for a proof no-S. Not made for frosted, but for Matte finishes. Good point tho
     
  5. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    But it is not a proof coin. Proof coins have square rims. Those rims are anything but square.
    [​IMG]
    courtesy of desertgem
     
  6. furryfrog02

    furryfrog02 Well-Known Member

    Not a proof. A nicely struck business-strike coin just as Kirkuleez said.
     
  7. coinman1234

    coinman1234 Not a Well-Known Member

    It looks like a normal Philly minted nickel, also, the mint never made a matte proof nickel.
     
  8. Braydon

    Braydon Make your own history, with history you can own.

    Well ty gentlemen, I believe I pulled my inspiration from that.
     
    coinman1234 likes this.
  9. coinman1234

    coinman1234 Not a Well-Known Member

    Very nice nickel anyways. I would keep it for sure.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page