Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Oldhoopster, post: 3574210, member: 84179&quot;]If you don’t like the responses you received (some of them are from experienced error collectors and numismatists), you can always do the research yourself.&nbsp; Go to:</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.varietyvista.com/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.varietyvista.com/" rel="nofollow">www.varietyvista.com</a></p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.doubleddie.com/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.doubleddie.com/" rel="nofollow">www.doubleddie.com</a></p><p><br /></p><p>They have listings of the known doubled dies.&nbsp; See if you can find an exact match.&nbsp; If you can’t find a match and think you have something new, they will do evaluations for a fee.&nbsp; Your pic quality is poor (just being factual, not personally critical), but from what I can see, it’s either mechanical doubling (MD) or die deterioration doubling (DDD), so my recommendation is to move on.&nbsp; There are multitudes of MD and DDD for every true doubled die.&nbsp; That’s why these are referred to as “worthless doubling”.&nbsp; Hope this helps[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in