Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
1969s
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="bhp3rd, post: 510317, member: 16510"]<b>I've had rolls of them!</b></p><p><br /></p><p>I've had rolls of them - what has been said before is true.</p><p>Mechanical doubling or strike doubling is very common esp. on this year/mint - you can't sling a cat in this house without hitting some of them.</p><p>The comment about the mintmark and doubling warrants further study and it would be helpful to any of you'all to learn it. I only hope it also has not been beat to death on here before:</p><p>Prior to about 1990 the mint mark was applied by hand to the working die thus resulting in those varieties we love RPM's. A doublED die is just that, the die is doubled during the hubbing process The working die is prepared, (hubbed) THEN the mintmark applied. DoublED die occur before the maintmark is added - there fore a doubled die with a mintmark doubled in the same direction with the same sort of spread cannot (99 of 100 times) be a true doubled die. Conversely a mintmark cannot be a portion of a hubb doubled die until sometimes after 1990 because it was not even there during hubbing. The 1995-D DDO-003 has a mintmark being a portion of that doubled die because it was in place during hubbing.</p><p>There are exceptions as Potter noted on that 1969-S DDO-001 that was found last year had some die shift or mechanical doubling also along with the major doublED die. Earlier there were also doubled dies with RPM's also, RPM-100 and the 42-S come to mind. We also found 1957-D quarter that had a "D" in the wreath about a quarter inch away from the primary but later determined to be on a master die or master hubb - some of you may remember we found the same "D" on at least 4 different working dies. Wiles never thought it was one by I have a gem one and all you have to do is see it one time and you would flip-it's a "D".</p><p>Now if you think this is complicated I gave the simplest of explanation as I could here.</p><p>Mechanical doubling as on this cent is only one of the criteria we use to help explain what type of thing occurred to cause the doubling.</p><p>But my ain't it fun!!!!!</p><p> </p><p>Ben "took me ten years to get all this stuff straight" Peters[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="bhp3rd, post: 510317, member: 16510"][b]I've had rolls of them![/b] I've had rolls of them - what has been said before is true. Mechanical doubling or strike doubling is very common esp. on this year/mint - you can't sling a cat in this house without hitting some of them. The comment about the mintmark and doubling warrants further study and it would be helpful to any of you'all to learn it. I only hope it also has not been beat to death on here before: Prior to about 1990 the mint mark was applied by hand to the working die thus resulting in those varieties we love RPM's. A doublED die is just that, the die is doubled during the hubbing process The working die is prepared, (hubbed) THEN the mintmark applied. DoublED die occur before the maintmark is added - there fore a doubled die with a mintmark doubled in the same direction with the same sort of spread cannot (99 of 100 times) be a true doubled die. Conversely a mintmark cannot be a portion of a hubb doubled die until sometimes after 1990 because it was not even there during hubbing. The 1995-D DDO-003 has a mintmark being a portion of that doubled die because it was in place during hubbing. There are exceptions as Potter noted on that 1969-S DDO-001 that was found last year had some die shift or mechanical doubling also along with the major doublED die. Earlier there were also doubled dies with RPM's also, RPM-100 and the 42-S come to mind. We also found 1957-D quarter that had a "D" in the wreath about a quarter inch away from the primary but later determined to be on a master die or master hubb - some of you may remember we found the same "D" on at least 4 different working dies. Wiles never thought it was one by I have a gem one and all you have to do is see it one time and you would flip-it's a "D". Now if you think this is complicated I gave the simplest of explanation as I could here. Mechanical doubling as on this cent is only one of the criteria we use to help explain what type of thing occurred to cause the doubling. But my ain't it fun!!!!! Ben "took me ten years to get all this stuff straight" Peters[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
1969s
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...