1969 s penny rpm

Discussion in 'What's it Worth' started by Chris .c., Oct 17, 2018.

  1. Chris .c.

    Chris .c. Member

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. BooksB4Coins

    BooksB4Coins Newbieus Sempiterna

    Strike doubling.
     
    eddiespin and tommyc03 like this.
  4. Chris .c.

    Chris .c. Member

    So what’s the correct way to call this
     
  5. BooksB4Coins

    BooksB4Coins Newbieus Sempiterna

    Strike doubling.
     
    eddiespin likes this.
  6. tommyc03

    tommyc03 Senior Member

    Not an error. It's the result of faulty machine maintenance. As Books said above.
     
  7. Chris .c.

    Chris .c. Member

    How can a coin have to mint marks and not be an error
     
  8. tommyc03

    tommyc03 Senior Member

    When the extra mint mark is flat and shelf like it's like I said above. There was some chatter in the coining chamber that caused this. A true doubled mint mark comes from the hubbing process, which is not what this is. A true doubled die is hub doubled, not strike doubled. There is a lot of good info on both of these terms on www.doubleddie.com. When it's faulty machine problems these are not errors, just sloppy coin making.
     
    Dave363 likes this.
  9. BooksB4Coins

    BooksB4Coins Newbieus Sempiterna

    Strike doubling.
     
    eddiespin likes this.
  10. Dave363

    Dave363 Well-Known Member

    Most of the time when you see your Mint Mark and date doubled it's normally SD (strike doubling) or MD Machine Doubling from my understanding.
    Dave
     
  11. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor

    1955SSS.JPG

    My 1955 S/S/S shows tripling mm, but the date does not. It is 1955S-1MM-001.

    Jim
     
    tommyc03 and Bambam8778 like this.
  12. Bambam8778

    Bambam8778 Well-Known Member

    Good eye Chris! Keep this one in a 2X2 and use it to remind yourself of the differences in doubling. It can be difficult at times. I still question myself!
     
    tommyc03 likes this.
  13. Chris .c.

    Chris .c. Member

    thanks for the info it helps
     
  14. dick cummings

    dick cummings New Member

    Would this be a RPM
     

    Attached Files:

  15. tommyc03

    tommyc03 Senior Member

    More likely a die chip. The 1968-1974 "S" cents were notorius for die chips. I did enlarge your pic and am pretty sure it's a chip.
     
    Collecting Nut likes this.
  16. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    It could also be damaged. The 969 are worn flat at the top and on the right side. I can't enlarge the mintmark enough to see a chip.
     
    tommyc03 likes this.
  17. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    No
     
  18. justin stetler

    justin stetler New Member

    Is this an official rpm? The second nine is super thick.
     

    Attached Files:

  19. justin stetler

    justin stetler New Member

    I also can't tell if this is a proof coin. It is shiny like glass. It's this one real? I apologize if any of this is in the wrong spot I'm very new to all this and still learning thank you for your help and your patience.
     

    Attached Files:

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page