Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Just Carl, post: 525419, member: 4552&quot;]Kind of a tuff question. The older Red Books had G, F, Unc and Proof. Back then that was all anyone cared about. And then they got real complicated with terminology like AG, EF, AU. AND for who knows someone really messed things up with a 70 point system. Now you can&#039;t even compare a UNC with all those MS-62,-63,-64, etc. </p><p>My suggestion is to just use all G-x and VG-x as G for comparisons.</p><p>Then All F-x, VF-x and EF-x as what used to be F. Naturally that only leaves all those MS&#039;s and AU&#039;s as what used to be UNC. </p><p>Other than that if you really want to make such a comparison you would just have to guess a lot. </p><p>Things were so simple back in the old days. I still remember when that Red Book first came out and wondered why anyone would go through all that trouble trying to evaluate the different prices of a coin. Why not like socks, one size fits all?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in