Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;chrisild, post: 2953458, member: 39&quot;]The catalogs that I have do not provide the same info - but maybe just because one of the two I have is older. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> My 2011 Jaeger says that the CuNi version (Cu75) was a test issue that never entered circulation. Schön 2017 explains that the relevant government bulletin had merely demanded &quot;Kupfernickel&quot;, so both types had legal tender status.</p><p><br /></p><p>There are lots of other varieties of that coin, e.g. Cu63 Zn37 or Cu62 Zn20 Ni18, but those are considered to be patterns. Also, some of the regular (Cu90) coins are magnetic while most are not. And a lucky collector might have found an error piece with a Mongolian edge inscription ...</p><p><br /></p><p>Christian[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in