1968 s one cent ddo

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by User12345666, Jan 16, 2020.

  1. User12345666

    User12345666 Active Member

    Found this ccrh. Is this a ddo? 20200116_021651.jpg 20200116_021706.jpg 20200116_022244.jpg Thu Jan 16 02-01-14.jpg Thu Jan 16 02-01-38.jpg
     
    Last edited: Jan 16, 2020
    HollyRorieNetwork likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. It's worth a lot in pristine condition, according to this article with a similar description as your rarity, so it might be worth encasing to prevent any further damage. JMO.
     
  4. User12345666

    User12345666 Active Member

    I READ ITS A machine double not a ddo. so I made a post for no reason lol sorry guys..
     
    GenX Enthusiast and paddyman98 like this.

  5. No worries we all make mistakes. I put the wrong year in the above search myself.
     
  6. paddyman98

    paddyman98 Let me burst your bubble! Supporter

    :facepalm:
     
    Chuck_A and Oldhoopster like this.
  7. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    It looks like Die Deterioration Doubling to me rather than machine doubling. Note how the doubling is a bit sloppy (uneven). ~ Chris
     
  8. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    I'm thinking it's some of both. Can't decide.
     
    Spark1951 likes this.
  9. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    The date, mintmark and "LIBERTY" all look like DDD to me. ~ Chris
     
    MatrixMP-9 likes this.
  10. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    Worn die caused NAV Doubling.
     
  11. MatrixMP-9

    MatrixMP-9 Supporter! Supporter

    Isnt the first give away the MM being of similar doubling as the date? There could obviously be other things going on but when its the same or similar this flags machine correct?
     
    Spark1951 likes this.
  12. ken454

    ken454 Well-Known Member

    its die deterioration doubling, worthless doubling, proven by the fact that the mint mark has the identical doubling as the date, which is impossible in 1968 as the mint mark was hand punched into the die after it was made and therefore after any true doubling would have happened...
     
    MatrixMP-9 and Spark1951 like this.
  13. Spark1951

    Spark1951 Accomplishment, not Activity Supporter

    ...maybe a northward shift of the working die at strike? MD.
    ...Spark
     
  14. coinquest1961

    coinquest1961 Active Member

    Classic machine doubling-not a doubled die.
     
  15. enamel7

    enamel7 Junior Member

    Wrong!
     
  16. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    Strike-doubling
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page