1968-S 25¢ Pr WRPM-002

Discussion in 'What's it Worth' started by CeciliaS81, Apr 3, 2022.

  1. CeciliaS81

    CeciliaS81 Active Member

    this first pics were with a microscope camera second set of pics taken with phone
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. expat

    expat Remember you are unique, just like everyone else Supporter

    When you have got the images uploaded to your post, you will see above them Post all as Full Image, click that before you click post reply. The images will then be very large and expandable so members can get a really good look and be able to give their opinions. As an example, full size looks like this
    20210808_000536 (2).jpg 20210808_001235 (2).jpg
     
  4. CeciliaS81

    CeciliaS81 Active Member

    some more taken outside in natural light
     

    Attached Files:

  5. CeciliaS81

    CeciliaS81 Active Member

  6. ifthevamzarockin

    ifthevamzarockin Well-Known Member

    The second photos with the phone are better. ;)

    It doesn't appear that it would get a cameo if sent for grading.
    The reverse would hold it back.

    It's too bad about the spots but do not try to clean the coin in any way.
    If sent to PCGS you could ask if they thought it would be a good one for restoration.

    It is a strong RPM and appears it's the best one for the date.
    There is a chance that the reason info is hard to find is because it's rare.

    As far as value I would guess it would surprise you & most people here.
    My guess would also be that the coin is worth the cost of grading.
    Sorry I can't help more with a dollar value but it will depend if you sell it raw or have it graded and what the grade turns out to be.
     
  7. CeciliaS81

    CeciliaS81 Active Member

    20220403_103235.jpg
     

    Attached Files:

  8. CeciliaS81

    CeciliaS81 Active Member


    Thank you for the help
     
    ifthevamzarockin likes this.
  9. potty dollar 1878

    potty dollar 1878 Well-Known Member

    Ok with the new pictures the coin isn't as bad as I thought.But still the milk spots e.t.c will hold it back quite a bit,I would suggest PCGS now.Make sure though they will attribute the RPM I would say grade wise Proof 67.
     
  10. ifthevamzarockin

    ifthevamzarockin Well-Known Member

    This photo is your best photo so far.

    Edited to add: Try to get a photo this good of the reverse.
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Apr 3, 2022
  11. CeciliaS81

    CeciliaS81 Active Member

    I was going to submit a coin about a year ago but got really confused about all, the options it has when submitting the coin. I didnt know what to chose
     
  12. ifthevamzarockin

    ifthevamzarockin Well-Known Member

    Try to get a better reverse photo then we can go from there. ;)
     
  13. 1stSgt22

    1stSgt22 I'm just me! Supporter

    Your microscope should turn so the base doesn't obstruct the view. Sit the microscope on something higher until you can see the entire coin on the screen then add some weight to the base so it doesn't tip over. You can zoom in or out to fill the screen with the image. Once you have taken the picture, you can crop it if necessary, using your computer photo program!
     
  14. CeciliaS81

    CeciliaS81 Active Member

    This was the coin I was going to send it. Silver 20220403_112814(1).jpg 20220403_112223.jpg Bicentennial Dollar Proof
     
    Penny Luster likes this.
  15. CeciliaS81

    CeciliaS81 Active Member

    Never did though
     
  16. CeciliaS81

    CeciliaS81 Active Member

    ok
     
  17. CeciliaS81

    CeciliaS81 Active Member

  18. ifthevamzarockin

    ifthevamzarockin Well-Known Member

    Okay, that is a better reverse photo.
    Give me a chance to review a few things and I will post a reply in a bit. ;)

    Good chance the silver dollar would not be worth the cost of grading.
     
  19. CeciliaS81

    CeciliaS81 Active Member

  20. CeciliaS81

    CeciliaS81 Active Member

    Oh really thanks glad i didn't send it in
     
  21. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    This image compares to your # 4 photo, it is a 69S cent and it is considered mechanical doubling since the underlying images have a flat sheared surface. If you have access to the microscope, you can slowly focus up and down and see if each doubling is rounded ( RPM) or flat (damage).
    A flat surface goes quickly in/out of focus with vertical movement, rounded goes in/out gradually.
    Good Luck, Jim 1969srpm_zps047c52a3.jpg
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page