1968 D Penny date error

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by Michelle0128, Oct 22, 2018.

  1. Michelle0128

    Michelle0128 New Member

    Hello everyone, I am new to coin collecting but after reading through past threads I do believe I am in the right place for great feedback.
    I have found a 1968 D Lincoln cent that has something odd going on with the 6 and 8 in the date. Is this a common error or is it even an error at all? If anyone can help I would greatly appreciate it. A455C992-1EF1-4073-A704-A54F8EA5D185.jpeg 2A0BBEE6-3C73-40AD-A64B-B588F696ECEB.png
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    The odd looking numeral 8 is a hit. Most likely as a result from a coin wrapper crimping machine. You can see a faint circular scratch abouve the numerals leading to the date. Il
    It is not a Mint Error but Post Mint Damage.

    We see these a lot with the same question.

    Welcome to CoinTalk
     
  4. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    This is how it occurs. If someone presses the roll to the machine a bit to hard it could damage the end coin. semacon-cm-65-crimper.jpg
     
  5. Michelle0128

    Michelle0128 New Member

    Thank you!
     
    paddyman98 likes this.
  6. Michelle0128

    Michelle0128 New Member

    I also have another coin I would like to ask about. I’ve noticed it is much different than other Nickels I have seen, Is this anything important? 3D7D0658-D3E8-427C-8405-34B15B331122.jpeg 0730B6F5-074A-4830-9D98-08BE38C13F0D.jpeg
     
  7. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

  8. tammiGee

    tammiGee Active Member

    Does the reverse look like circulation wear or perhaps a grease fill or a die attrition punch to you? I've been studying wear on Jefferson's and have seen a few attrition errors on one side and a decent punch on the other.
     
  9. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    I see no Attrition Error at all. Looks like a normal circulated Wartime Nickel.
     
    Oldhoopster likes this.
  10. tammiGee

    tammiGee Active Member

    The change in metals used is causing premature wear you think. I see a lot of older Jeffs than that with half that wear on the reverse. I was wondering why the 42-45's were so torn up. I bet the meteorologists didn't put enough thought into that for just a 4 year change. I got a war nickel the other day in change and it was a smoothie.
     
  11. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    I think that 75 years if circulation between the time it was minted until now is the culprit! I have seen more modern Nickels that look in worse shape than the one just shown.
     
  12. tammiGee

    tammiGee Active Member

    Say a quick question, can you hurt a token with a soap and water cleaning? Not so much value wise but physically? I think this one is made of tin. Sounds like a fender washer when dropped on marble...
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page