But here's the problem, I cannot get a decent picture, without glare, because the coin is still in its Special Mint Set package. Here's an attempt with my Pixel 3A. Any thoughts (printable)?
One second it looks yes, the next second it looks no,because of, like you say, the packaging. But be that as it may, do you know of Whidbey Island in the Sound? Do you know anybody who lives there?
"But be that as it may, do you know of Whidbey Island in the Sound? Do you know anybody who lives there?" I know a few people on Whidbey.
Do you know a musician who uses the stage name "Craig Stevenz". His band is called The Victims of Kool. or a female singer named Julie Harrop Rutherford? Her stage name is "Julzz".
Nice looking quarter. The Catch-22 is that you would have to take it out of the OGP to get a proper photo, and that would destroy the SMS provenance. So you can't take it out.
Looking at it shows definite doubling from all angles. Can't be properly documented with a photo, however. I'll just slap a label on it and let my kids deal with it after I'm dead.
Not all doubling is the good kind of doubling. In fact most kinds are not the good kind. Here is the Wexler's article on the 1967, perhaps you can compare your coin to it. I don't recall seeing a nicer 1967 so there is that. They list 5 types on the obv and 4 on the rev. https://www.doubleddie.com/1967437.html
I have been using Wexler as my reference and that's where I came up with my original diagnosis. I'll see if I can delve further into it. Thanks.
