Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
1967 Kennedy half realizes $12,600
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="baseball21, post: 3270618, member: 76863"]We certainly disagree a lot, it just always frustrates me to see people trying to tear down others for no reason just because they have a bigger budget. We all have a bigger one than some, and less than others. </p><p><br /></p><p>For forums at least I see threads like these and just know some of the comments that will come. I just don't understand why collectors aren't allowed to have money without being torn down. </p><p><br /></p><p>By no means could I afford those types of coins, but I always hate the this is a common coin or they're just doing it for ego comments. The negativity of collectors on forums has worn me out. If I could though I would keep it hidden like many do because sharing it just gets the boo birds out of the woodwork.</p><p><br /></p><p>Some top set collectors do talk about them, and many admit they don't care if they "over paid" for something they wanted. Truth be told the coins that I still have years later and didn't regret I did "overpay" at the time, but they aren't supposed to be investments. In this case it isn't even clear the sale was for a set unless someone has proof of that. Many people use registry sets to track their inventory or just share what they have, and things like this are why a lot don't.</p><p><br /></p><p>I also hate the modern bias. A coin is a coin and a collector is a collector no matter when the coin was made. It isn't less of a coin just because it is a modern, nor are the elite modern coins anywhere near as common as some collecting snobs make them out to be. It shouldn't matter if it's clad or silver quality is quality just as conditional rarity is rarity. A lot of conditional rarity moderns are actually more rare than the classic "key dates" </p><p><br /></p><p>It does just frustrates me overall to see a lot of the get off my lawn type stuff because that's not what they would do. Many could run around to other threads and trash their purchases but don't, but the buyers for coins like these can't get the same respect for some reason. </p><p><br /></p><p>The whole registry thing is very overplayed for purchasing stuff. Most top sets are done for a purpose and the quality they desire, it's not the blind buying type thing some make it out to be. </p><p><br /></p><p>Anyway that's my frustration rant for the day about how collectors treat each other and than they wonder why more people don't want to participate on chat boards or be public[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="baseball21, post: 3270618, member: 76863"]We certainly disagree a lot, it just always frustrates me to see people trying to tear down others for no reason just because they have a bigger budget. We all have a bigger one than some, and less than others. For forums at least I see threads like these and just know some of the comments that will come. I just don't understand why collectors aren't allowed to have money without being torn down. By no means could I afford those types of coins, but I always hate the this is a common coin or they're just doing it for ego comments. The negativity of collectors on forums has worn me out. If I could though I would keep it hidden like many do because sharing it just gets the boo birds out of the woodwork. Some top set collectors do talk about them, and many admit they don't care if they "over paid" for something they wanted. Truth be told the coins that I still have years later and didn't regret I did "overpay" at the time, but they aren't supposed to be investments. In this case it isn't even clear the sale was for a set unless someone has proof of that. Many people use registry sets to track their inventory or just share what they have, and things like this are why a lot don't. I also hate the modern bias. A coin is a coin and a collector is a collector no matter when the coin was made. It isn't less of a coin just because it is a modern, nor are the elite modern coins anywhere near as common as some collecting snobs make them out to be. It shouldn't matter if it's clad or silver quality is quality just as conditional rarity is rarity. A lot of conditional rarity moderns are actually more rare than the classic "key dates" It does just frustrates me overall to see a lot of the get off my lawn type stuff because that's not what they would do. Many could run around to other threads and trash their purchases but don't, but the buyers for coins like these can't get the same respect for some reason. The whole registry thing is very overplayed for purchasing stuff. Most top sets are done for a purpose and the quality they desire, it's not the blind buying type thing some make it out to be. Anyway that's my frustration rant for the day about how collectors treat each other and than they wonder why more people don't want to participate on chat boards or be public[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
1967 Kennedy half realizes $12,600
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...