Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
1965 Lincoln Cent- Proof?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="SorenCoins, post: 3577755, member: 73708"]Hi there guys! I found this penny on the street a little while ago (I think in a parking lot), and the sharpness of the rims really caught my attention. They were sharp, and so I thought that maybe due to the strong detail and interesting appearance of the fields that it may be a circulated proof.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]954119[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]954120[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]954121[/ATTACH] </p><p>I imaged it here, with a 1963 lightly circulated and toned proof on the left, the coin in question in the middle, and a standard business strike 1965 on the right. I think it’s odd because the obverse fields seem to resemble the proof more than the business strike, while the reverse fields seem to resemble the business strike more than the proof. I know that proof coins are typically thicker due to the higher pressures so I did a rim size comparison photo with the proof on top, coin in question in middle, and the business 1965 on bottom. Lemme know you guys think! Also as most cents seem to be from this era the rim size is somewhat variable depending on the coin location and this was a thicker angle of the coin in question when stacked up.</p><p><br /></p><p>Thanks,</p><p><br /></p><p>Soren.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="SorenCoins, post: 3577755, member: 73708"]Hi there guys! I found this penny on the street a little while ago (I think in a parking lot), and the sharpness of the rims really caught my attention. They were sharp, and so I thought that maybe due to the strong detail and interesting appearance of the fields that it may be a circulated proof. [ATTACH=full]954119[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]954120[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]954121[/ATTACH] I imaged it here, with a 1963 lightly circulated and toned proof on the left, the coin in question in the middle, and a standard business strike 1965 on the right. I think it’s odd because the obverse fields seem to resemble the proof more than the business strike, while the reverse fields seem to resemble the business strike more than the proof. I know that proof coins are typically thicker due to the higher pressures so I did a rim size comparison photo with the proof on top, coin in question in middle, and the business 1965 on bottom. Lemme know you guys think! Also as most cents seem to be from this era the rim size is somewhat variable depending on the coin location and this was a thicker angle of the coin in question when stacked up. Thanks, Soren.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
1965 Lincoln Cent- Proof?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...