Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
1965-1998 Clad Quarters Share us your collection and why
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="cladking, post: 3176955, member: 68"]I've always found many dates of clad quarters to be fascinating and the 1973 is one of the most fascinating. These were released over a very short period of time because the mint had already instituted FIFO accounting that required quarters in storage the longest to be shipped first. All of them were released by early 1975 making this one of the first dates to be released in its entirety. Some older dates like the 1965 were still sitting in storage as late as mid-'75. </p><p><br /></p><p>The 1973's seemed to wear extremely well in circulation and AU's were still pretty common as late as 1981. But time took a very heavy toll on these when all the luster finally wore off and they became heavily worn very quickly. There were still a very few AU's in the mid-80's but most of the issue was heavily worn and they were getting pretty thin. They also picked up scratches more than other dates. </p><p><br /></p><p>The only explanation I can come up with is that they were annealed a little differently with the outside very hard but below this "crust" was a much softer metal. </p><p><br /></p><p>Even though these were so common in high grade early on I believe it will be among the toughest of all clads in nice VF or better. While the Denver was better struck it seems to have suffered more wear and higher attrition. Only a nice well made and unmolested 1969-P will be tougher in VF, probably.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="cladking, post: 3176955, member: 68"]I've always found many dates of clad quarters to be fascinating and the 1973 is one of the most fascinating. These were released over a very short period of time because the mint had already instituted FIFO accounting that required quarters in storage the longest to be shipped first. All of them were released by early 1975 making this one of the first dates to be released in its entirety. Some older dates like the 1965 were still sitting in storage as late as mid-'75. The 1973's seemed to wear extremely well in circulation and AU's were still pretty common as late as 1981. But time took a very heavy toll on these when all the luster finally wore off and they became heavily worn very quickly. There were still a very few AU's in the mid-80's but most of the issue was heavily worn and they were getting pretty thin. They also picked up scratches more than other dates. The only explanation I can come up with is that they were annealed a little differently with the outside very hard but below this "crust" was a much softer metal. Even though these were so common in high grade early on I believe it will be among the toughest of all clads in nice VF or better. While the Denver was better struck it seems to have suffered more wear and higher attrition. Only a nice well made and unmolested 1969-P will be tougher in VF, probably.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
1965-1998 Clad Quarters Share us your collection and why
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...