Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;MixtureNo79, post: 3704657, member: 42957&quot;]No problem! There has been some confusion regarding these coins. The typical Accented Hair Kennedy (always proof from Phily mint) has the Accented hair (obviously), the missing or incorrect serif on the bottom of the &quot;I&quot; in Liberty, and also on the reverse has the broken rays and the straight G.</p><p><br /></p><p>There is a variety that has the reverse qualities but not the obverse qualities that are also proof which have been called &quot;Transitional Variety&quot;. My understanding is that there are also some Business versions of this same &quot;Transitional Variety&quot;. They all probably have an official variety number now.</p><p><br /></p><p>But I have not yet heard of a Business version of a true AHK (unless someone puts a proof in circulation - which would be pretty much a fake, but I am sure it has happened.)</p><p><br /></p><p>My main question is: how common is it to have a 1964 proof set with a true AHK with all of the AHK qualifiers checked, that does NOT have a pointed 9 dime in the same set. This is the first one I have ever come across.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in