Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Barnabus, post: 2014721, member: 71080&quot;]I do not understand how the D has anything how to do with whether or not it is a proof. In 1964 they made proof sets at all mints, unlike other years. Wexler&#039;s currently defines several varieties for this coin, and one of which has bold arrows, and the 2nd leave is visible, which mine has a longer trail down the leave making it a possible proof.&nbsp; I&#039;ll toss in a link for this info, as well the SMS coin was produced in late 64 to test for the 65 dyes. </p><p><a href="http://www.pcgscoinfacts.com/Coin/Detail/5974?redir=t" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.pcgscoinfacts.com/Coin/Detail/5974?redir=t" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcgscoinfacts.com/Coin/Detail/5974?redir=t</a></p><p><a href="http://doubleddie.com/58348.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://doubleddie.com/58348.html" rel="nofollow">http://doubleddie.com/58348.html</a></p><p>The background on the quarter I have is very smooth, but still highly reflective, with the potential proof possibility from the dye variation, this brings into light the Satin finish SMS strike. As well it has a left to right grain that is hard to see in the photo. IDK, I see the possibility, but then again I have the coin in hand, all that I can show you are the pictures I am able to take.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in