1964-D Peace Dollar $10,000.00 Reward

Discussion in 'What's it Worth' started by jello, Apr 6, 2013.

  1. Caleb

    Caleb Active Member

    Sorry, but “that ship just won’t float” :rolleyes:

    A coin is “monetized” when the U.S. Mint makes it, period. The U.S. Mint can “un-monetize” the coin by melting it or “waffling it”. As I have tried to explain earlier, monetize means according to the definition of the Merriam – Webster dictionary as can be seen in this link: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/monetize

    Difinition:
    1 : To coin into Money; also : to establish as legal tender

    No where in the definition does it say it has to be issued.

    So let’s recap: If the US Government “coined” a planchet with a face value it is monetized or if the US Government establishes an item like a rock as “legal tender” it is monetized. It just has to be one or the other, not necessarily both.:devil:

    To reinforce this point, let’s look at Section 102 of the “Coinage Act of 1965” which was passed after the minting / striking / coining / manufacturing of the 1964-D Peace dollars. Section 102 clearly states: “All coins and currencies of the United States, regardless of when coined or issued, shall be legal tender …” So just the fact that it was coined makes it legal tender and if it is legal tender then it is “monetized”.

    Why some idiot attorney for the Government (there is a reason why he is not making money in the private sector) said that a special certificate had to be issued to monetize the 1 1933 double eagle is anyone guess. Do you have a special certificate on you for each coin that you own? Why would this certificate of monetization be required for one coin and all other coins minted by our Mints don’t need one? Like I said before, there is a reason that attorneys are not rocket scientist or brain surgeons.:eek:

    On the subject of ownership for the 1964-D Peace dollars, that is a whole other question. While the coins where monetized at the time of manufacture and several if not all were un- monetized when they hit the melting pot, if any survived, legal ownership would still have to be proven.

    Example, the Treasury had a handful of $ 100,000 note printed, they are legal tender and monetized but they are all in Government control I believe. If one suddenly showed up for sale, I’m sure that the Government would want to know were it came from.

    Just my two cent on the subject.


     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. spock1k

    spock1k King of Hearts

    but Max knew that the nickels existed are we saying that we know the peace exists?
     
  4. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins

    Well, Caleb seems to think so.........:)
     
  5. spock1k

    spock1k King of Hearts

    well my take is if its out there then GD knows about it.

    it is simply not possible for him to not know
     
  6. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I'm not saying that at all. Nor am I saying that I know none exist in private hands. All I am saying is that the evidence, testimony, and facts, that we do have seem to indicate that none exist in private hands.

    I have talked to people face to face who claim to have seen genuine examples of the '64 Peace in hand. And they are people I would normally trust. But at the same time I am also aware of the ability, the skill, of counterfeiters. And I know that anybody can be fooled.

    So until one surfaces and is authenticated, then I am inclined to think that none do exist given the evidence, testimony, and facts that we do have.

    edit - and no spock, that isn't true. I think of myself as being reasonably wise. And the wise man knows there is much he has yet to learn.
     
  7. spock1k

    spock1k King of Hearts

    There it took only 105 posts but we finally got the answer. There is nothing that GD doesnt know about. He only needs to say it in post 1 :D.

    Now on to next question Grandpa with the volatility in the PM market where do you think the coin market is headed. again give us your no holds barred opinion. Thanks.

    BTW we have this argument a 1000 times before. There is no one mark my words no one who selflessly spread numismatic knowledge across the world as you do. I am not saying this to butter you up, (since when do kings butter their viziers :D) it is simply a fact. On this i will have to go with my opinion about you rather than yours. Sorry! People dont realize how lucky we are to have you. You may be right or you may be wrong in your opinions but you are 100 % selfless and honest and that is what counts IMHO. As far things to learn you continue to underestimate spock and get hammered every day :D but who is complaining.

    Another question. Do you think this is a marketing gimmick? there are only 2 reasons why anyone offers a bounty one they know it will be fulfilled beforehand or two they know it cant be fulfilled before hand so its a free publicity for them. just my 2 cents
     
  8. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    Of course Mehl also knew he would not be offered a genuine nickel for $50. PCGS does not know they won't be shown a genuine 64-D dollar.
     
  9. spock1k

    spock1k King of Hearts

    i am pretty sure no one is going to risk their 64 for $10k. they might end up losing it.
     
  10. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    It's not PCGS's job to report these coins to the government. All they have to do is slab one as authentic and they can state that one exists.
     
  11. spock1k

    spock1k King of Hearts

    and pray tell dear camaro what happens when the government comes calling. i am sure someone will definitely complain as soon as pcgs certifies.
     
  12. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    My opinion has not changed, I don't think we've seen the bottom yet.


    Already answered that. No matter what happens it's a win win for them. That's why they did it.
     
  13. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins

    Didn't someone mention (above) that there was an aluminum cent in an ANACS slab? I don't think the Goobs messed with them, did they?
     
  14. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Or with the nickels, or with the dimes, or, or, or.

    That grounds already been covered.
     
  15. spock1k

    spock1k King of Hearts

    wht dont you and harvey and me come up with our own win win. time we made some money. i have forgotten what it looks like
     
  16. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    PCGS gives them the fake name the submitter used, and the PO Box # that the owner opened under a false name and abandoned as some as the coin was returned.
     
  17. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    My thoughts exactly. If someone has one and decided to submit it...I'm sure they will take care to protect themselves.
     
  18. Caleb

    Caleb Active Member

    And PCGS issues the check for the bounty to the fake name so the owner can not cash it! :devil:
     
  19. spock1k

    spock1k King of Hearts


    hmm we will know in a second if it works or not

    Eh grandpa come here and tell us if you had a 64 would you submit it? if yes then how?
     
  20. spock1k

    spock1k King of Hearts

    I don think anyone is going to go to jail at pcgs to protect the submitter. Once the govt walks in they will sing like canaries and probably get another reward. Thats a win win.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page