Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
1964 Canada Dollar is Proof or Proof-like because of... Dimpling??
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="SPP Ottawa, post: 2350579, member: 39508"]That is a textural term, used to describe the lower shoulder of the Queen which is almost never struck fully, even in Proof-like (PL) strikes. The early effigy of Queen Elizabeth II has considerable relief, and it takes a lot for a full strike.</p><p><br /></p><p>Compare a 1964 specimen strike: <a href="http://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/coinfacts.aspx?i=1264211&sid=6914" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/coinfacts.aspx?i=1264211&sid=6914" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/coinfacts.aspx?i=1264211&sid=6914</a></p><p><br /></p><p>To a 1964 proof-like strike: <a href="http://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/coinfacts.aspx?i=98355&sid=6914" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/coinfacts.aspx?i=98355&sid=6914" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/coinfacts.aspx?i=98355&sid=6914</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Other years, like 1956 and 1957 are impossible to find without that dimpling on the Queen's shoulder.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/coinfacts.aspx?i=230619&sid=6914" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/coinfacts.aspx?i=230619&sid=6914" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/coinfacts.aspx?i=230619&sid=6914</a></p><p><br /></p><p>In summary, the lack of dimpling on the specimen strikes is because they were fully struck. Note that these images are not my coins, they were just easy to use to explain the OP's question.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="SPP Ottawa, post: 2350579, member: 39508"]That is a textural term, used to describe the lower shoulder of the Queen which is almost never struck fully, even in Proof-like (PL) strikes. The early effigy of Queen Elizabeth II has considerable relief, and it takes a lot for a full strike. Compare a 1964 specimen strike: [url]http://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/coinfacts.aspx?i=1264211&sid=6914[/url] To a 1964 proof-like strike: [url]http://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/coinfacts.aspx?i=98355&sid=6914[/url] Other years, like 1956 and 1957 are impossible to find without that dimpling on the Queen's shoulder. [url]http://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/coinfacts.aspx?i=230619&sid=6914[/url] In summary, the lack of dimpling on the specimen strikes is because they were fully struck. Note that these images are not my coins, they were just easy to use to explain the OP's question.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
1964 Canada Dollar is Proof or Proof-like because of... Dimpling??
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...