Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
1964/66 Transactional Reverse Silver Quarter (6.3 Grams)
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Raykoon, post: 3652774, member: 106216"]THIS QUARTER SHOULD HAVE 5 STAMPS IN REVERSE ORDER. 1941 first stamp, than 1968 dc, 1966, than 1964. This is why the coin is a mint coin on a new math strong. The minting process has final 3 steps of the double die obverse + proof + mint collectible + the last variable which is kept secret and that coin is stored in their vault. This coin has 5 because it begins a new math string to proof out error coins. Make sure they are not error coins. The 1941 date was chosen so that they could go back in time and mathematically include all coins up to that point. In other words mathematically have every possible combination so that they would know if there was an error coin that was not theirs. If China created an error coin with properties pre 1964 this would be an issue if you didn’t have the exact combination that included all the variations up to 1964. </p><p><br /></p><p>The 1941 addition is not an accident. It was meant to create the control system for error coins. </p><p><br /></p><p>This is all I got unless anyone has questions[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Raykoon, post: 3652774, member: 106216"]THIS QUARTER SHOULD HAVE 5 STAMPS IN REVERSE ORDER. 1941 first stamp, than 1968 dc, 1966, than 1964. This is why the coin is a mint coin on a new math strong. The minting process has final 3 steps of the double die obverse + proof + mint collectible + the last variable which is kept secret and that coin is stored in their vault. This coin has 5 because it begins a new math string to proof out error coins. Make sure they are not error coins. The 1941 date was chosen so that they could go back in time and mathematically include all coins up to that point. In other words mathematically have every possible combination so that they would know if there was an error coin that was not theirs. If China created an error coin with properties pre 1964 this would be an issue if you didn’t have the exact combination that included all the variations up to 1964. The 1941 addition is not an accident. It was meant to create the control system for error coins. This is all I got unless anyone has questions[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
1964/66 Transactional Reverse Silver Quarter (6.3 Grams)
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...